Skip to main content

Mayor gets tough on firefighter overtime

April 2, 2012

PAWTUCKET — Despite an effective date of April 1, the Grebien Administration showed it wasn't fooling when it came to instituting key changes in the Pawtucket Fire Department that are designed to cut down on overtime costs.
According to city officials, members of the firefighters' union received a letter several months ago notifying them that beginning April 1 and running through June 30, there is a new plan to redeploy staffing, based on more than three called-in absences on a given shift, from the mandatory contractual minimum of 31 firefighters down to 28.
In addition, the administration has notified union members that a 25 percent co-pay for health and dental insurance benefits was being put into effect as of April 1 and running through June 30, and that there will be no lump sum payment for eight holidays during that period.
Mayor Donald Grebien and his director of administration, Antonio Pires, have said the changes are necessary due to estimates that the Fire Department's overtime budget of $2.2 million for the current fiscal year (ending June 30) will be over by $700,000, totaling $2.9 million.
Pires told The Times on Monday that such a level of overtime is “unsustainable as the city continues to take all steps to stay out of bankruptcy and remain financially solvent.”
He also noted that under the City Charter, the mayor is compelled to rein in costs that exceed what the City Council-approved budget has allocated.
Grebien, too, has stated publicly that he believes the Charter allows for a collective bargaining agreement to be superceded and there be a reduced allotment to a municipal department based on a perceived deficit.
Pires said that Fire Chief William Sisson “will direct the redeployments under the overall guiding principle that public safety will not be compromised.”
He said this may include assigning fewer firefighters to a given shift or more to another, to maintain an optimum complement that avoids overtime as much as possible, or adjusting staffing levels on an engine apparatus.
Pires said the main issue is overtime staffing. He said that on Sunday, for example, there were 11 call-ins by fire personnel over two shifts saying they would not be reporting for their shift as scheduled. He said this is an ongoing situation that has required that the absent regularly scheduled firefighters be replaced by bringing in other firefighters at overtime pay to take their place, at a significant added cost to taxpayers.
Pires said that, contrary to some rumors that have been swirling in the city and on social media websites, there are no plans to close a fire station. He did say that the redeployment could require reducing the number of engines out of Station 4 on Cottage Street from two to one. Because this station has two engine trucks, it is possible that the older Engine 4 truck is not staffed on some shifts.
However, that would still leave an operable ladder truck there for an emergency such as a major mill structure fire, and the station itself would remain open.
Pires said that with the redeployment, it is possible that in a given circumstance, a particular fire station may have to be closed for a particular shift on a particular night. “But that is far from closing a station down, which again is not what is being done under the redeployment.”
Fire Chief William Sisson said that because the complement of firefighters is down by 18, he expects there to be a shortage of personnel on every shift, which will mean running at minimum staffing of 28 firefighters rather than the 31 that the current contract requires. At least, this was the scenario on all three shifts since the changes went into effect on Sunday, he said.
Sisson said that Engine 4 was taken out of service at Station 4 on Cottage Street, but there is still Ladder 1 and two rescue vehicles remaining. “The Cottage Street Station is not closed but we are running short one engine in that district,” the chief stated.
Sisson declined to comment on whether he thought the changes would have any impact on public safety.
The firefighters' union, I.A.F.F. Local 1261, has filed a grievance on the various changes imposed by the administration. Fire Capt. Robert Neill, president of the union, said the contract requiring the minimum staffing of 31 firefighters is based on national fire safety formulas and protocols and was negotiated back in 2009.
“We believe that any reduction in manning translates to a safety issue, for both the firefighters and the people living in that district,” said Neill.
He also said that the decision to take one of the engine companies out of service at Station 4 creates the potential that people living in that district will have to wait longer for a response.
Neill said the union gave the administration “alternatives” back in September that were meant to address the overtime situation but these were rejected. He said he also believes the $700,000 figure projected back in January as being an overrun in the overtime budget is actually far less, at an estimated $300,00 to $400,000.
Neill also maintained that the administration has helped to create the overtime budget problem by not hiring the appropriate number of employees needed for the fire department. He said that while the city saved on one hand in salary and benefits, the overtime costs went up, creating a “Catch-22 situation.”
The firefighters' contact, as well as that of the city's police officers, expires on June 30.

Comments

Cut them a break

April 5, 2012 by Boss of bosses (not verified), 2 years 1 week ago
Comment: 233

Lay off the firemen!!
Do not bid out the EMS service, these men are professionals, I do not want some kid thats working on one of these private ambulance services working his way threw college and doing this part time coming to my door in my time of need.
And Cutting men why are we not trying to employe is that not the goal here. Cut fire men close stations and you will see people will get hurt and not get the care they need in a timely fashion .
So before you start cutting jobs you should stop and think am I do everything I can to cut spending. How bout you start with the city car and start paying for your own gas.
Leave the Fire men and Police Officers alone already have a hard enough job as it is they do not need this on top of it.

Get you facts straight !

April 3, 2012 by The Truth (not verified), 2 years 2 weeks ago
Comment: 231

First of all, to the Times: Do a little research prior to printing an article and the statements from someone that is not knowledgeable of what apparatus is stationed where in the city.
Here are a few ACCURATE corrections Regarding the reduction of THE Engine at Station 4.
Station 4 on Cottage Street has a compliment of ONE Engine Company, ONE Ladder Company, and ONE rescue Company. There WERE 8 personal assigned.
Now there are 5 personnel, of whom 2 are assigned to the ONE Rescue, and 3 assigned to the ONE Ladder. There may be RESERVE truck stored in the station from time to time, but there is no manning for these trucks. The ladder truck that is for emergence such as “Mill fires” as the Newly appointed $62,000 safety director stated, has no water for fire suppression. The rescue which does in excess of 4000 call per year is rarely at the station.
The Pawtucket “Administration” wants his cake and eat it too. They are the reason why we have overtime every day. They haven’t hired personal to replace the 20 Fire Fighters that have retired. But he seems to have an open check book when it comes to hiring his friends for positions that the City doesn’t need. IE: Friend Tony, Administrative Director, $62,000; TWO secretaries at $50,000.
Get your facts straight. Don’t take my word for this content, do your own research.

The Truth

Firefighter overtime

April 3, 2012 by CBPO4111 (not verified), 2 years 2 weeks ago
Comment: 230

I wonder if this Mayor has a brain in his head. Any normal person would realize that when you have lost approx 18 firefighter how do you make up for the difference. The only option is by increasing overtime. He does not say how much he saved by those firefighters lost. I think he is making the City viable to a large law suit if something or someone seriously gets or dies hurt during an emergency.
Remember citizens if could effect anyone in our community in an emergency.

Just want to provide some

April 3, 2012 by R Neill (not verified), 2 years 2 weeks ago
Comment: 229

Just want to provide some clarification on the article,
1. Cottage Street Fire Station normally has 0ne (1) engine not two, one ladder and one rescue.
2. With the reduced manning implementation, no engine is available from that station, everyone in the district has to wait for an outlying engine company to respond.
3. It is a safety issue, the taxpayers in that district are not being provided with the same quality of service as other districts.

 

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes