PROVIDENCE â At what point does a general school dress code policy become a strict uniform requirement?
That was one of the questions put to Rep. Agostinho Silva by the House Health Education and Welfare committee when he testified for his bill that would require the Central Falls School District to adopt âa reasonable school-wide dress code policy that requires pupils to wear a school-wide uniform and prohibits pupils from wearing âgang-related apparel.ââ
âThis bill is talking about just making sure children have the right to have a dress code, as opposed to mandating that certain kinds of uniforms be worn,â said Rep. Marvin Abney of Newport. With uniforms, he said, âyou do get into cost, and other things like that.â
Abney said he wanted to make sure a dress code does not âmorphâ into a uniform requirement.
Silva pointed out that his bill calls for a six-month period before a dress code would be required and in that time there would be meetings and public hearings to get input from parents and students. âThe parent groups, the student groups, the administrators would all be part of that discussion before they went forward with a dress code or uniform,â Silva said. He assured the panel that the policy will not be formulated behind closed doors and presented to parents as a fait accompli.
The Central Falls Democrat said âthere will be options for students as far as families who can not afford it.
No school department officials, or any parents or students from Central Falls, showed up to testify at the hearing.
Without using the G-word â Central Falls school officials adamantly deny that there are gangs in the cityâs high school or middle school â Silva explained that his legislation âwould discourage students from adopting âcolorsâ or outfits that set them apart from their peers and give them a different identity or distinguish cliques within the schools.
HEW Chairman Joseph McNamara, a retired Pawtucket School Department administrator pointed out that similar legislation was passed for the Woonsocket schools several years ago and former President Bill Clinton âwas a big supporter, and still is, of student dress codes, so you are in good company.â
Andy Andrade, special assistant to the commissioner of education for legislative affairs, told the committee that the Woonsocket bill passed in 2009. He noted that in 2010 there was a bill for school uniforms in Newport that did not pass.
In 2011, he added there was a bill to enable all school districts statewide to adopt dress codes âand we thought that was a great idea, rather than doing it piecemeal,â Andrade said.
He added that Silvaâs bill, âhas a lot of ingredients of one we would want. It seems in this bill there are a lot of room for different colors and different options.
âCritical to this,â Andrade said, âis that there is a stipulation for input from students, teachers and principals.â He said the state Department of Education would support the bill.â
The RI ACLU, on the other hand, does not.
Hillary Davis, a policy associate with the group, said it filed a complaint against the Woonsocket dress code in 2010 but it was later withdrawn when it was discovered that the policy was voluntary and was not being enforced.
Silvaâs legislation has a passage stating that each dress code policy âshall include a provision that no pupil shall be penalized academically or otherwise discriminated against nor denied attendance to school if the pupil's parents chose not to have the pupil comply with the school dress code policy.â
Davis said âwe donât believe Rhode Island schools have the legal authority to mandate a uniform dress code. She pointed to a 1971 ruling by the commissioner of education in a case called Gardner v. Cumberland School Committee that stated âNeither school administrators nor school committees have authority by law or by the constitution to determine the mode of dress of pupils unless it presents a clear and present danger to the studentâs health and safety, causes an interference with school work, or creates a classroom or school disorder.
âIn the 40 years since,â Davis said, âthat has not been challenged or overturned so we believe that is the law in Rhode Island at this point in time.â
Davis said research has shown that dress codes âdo not have the positive effects many schools hope that it will and in fact it has some negative effects. It does not keep students from competing in what they wear, it just transfers it to other parts of their clothing â their shoes, their watches, their backpacks.
âSome schools have found there is a competition over whose uniform looks newest, so kids who are low-income, who have hand-me-down uniforms, end up being singled out because their uniform looks older.â
The committee voted to hold the bill for further study.